Corrections and comments on some publications, Magnus Gustafsson
 

Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 235, 24 (2018):

The triangular line profile in Eq. (7) is non-zero only when νk'kJ'J-w < ν < νk'kJ'J+w.

J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 209, 232 (2018):

The triangular line profile in Eq. (16) is non-zero only when νn'nJ'J-ω < ν < νn'nJ'J+ω.

The last sentence of section 5.1.3 should read:

These coefficients include a factor 1/√3, which would otherwise have appeared as 1/3 in Eq. (16), and they account for the angular momentum selection rules

J. Chem. Phys. 147, 094308 (2017):

On the left hand side in Eq. (5) the probability should have superscript i → all f. It is thus distinct from the two-state probability i → f in Eq. (6).

J. Chem. Phys. 144, 044302 (2016):

Fig. 1, the upper inset, which concerns dipole moments: The vertical axis should display atomic units of dipole moment. The numbers in the published figure (−30 and −60) should be divided by 27.211. The numbers in the data file, which is provided as supplementary material, are correct.

J. Chem. Phys. 137, 104301 (2012):

In table IV the value of Ω' should equal 1 on the first and second row. The value of Ω should equal 1 on the third and fourth row.

J. Chem. Phys. 130, 164314 (2009): (typos)

  1. There are three equations without equation numbers between Eqs. (B1) and (B2). In the middle one of those (the one with DID) the right hand side should be multiplied by a factor sqrt(2/3).
  2. In the middle relation in Eq. (B2) (the one with DID) the factor sqrt(3/2) should go out.

J. Chem. Phys. 124, 144311 (2006): (typo)

The summation index V' in equation (14) should be a lower case v' (Greek nu'). On the other hand, the lower case v inside the summation should be a captital V.

J. Chem. Phys. 115, 5427 (2001): (comment on parameter values)

The a, b, and d parameter values in table III are given with too few significant digits to correctly reproduce the collision-induced background absorption, especially in the fundamental band. Better values are given below.

a b d
R0(0) -0.208977[-6] 0.876095[-8] -0.306704[-10]
R0(1) 0.628021[-6] -0.220323[-8] 0.611017[-11]
P1(1) 0.419582[-3] -0.241736[-6] 0.348191[-10]
R1(0) -0.331911[-3] 0.185684[-6] -0.258495[-10]
R1(1) 0.275607[-3] -0.140382[-6] 0.179002[-10]

J. Chem. Phys. 113, 3641 (2000): (typos)

  1. On the right hand side of equation (4) the factor 1/(n!) should go out.
  2. Third paragraph, second sentence on page 3643; replace with: The signs of the radial wave functions have been fixed so that they 'start' positive, going from r=0.
  3. On the right hand side of equation (8) the minus sign should be replaced by a plus sign.
  4. On the right hand side of equation (22) the factor r should go out.
  5. The right hand side of equation (29) should be multiplied by a factor sqrt(3)/(4 pi)